Who will know
how to repair it?
We can inherit a bridge in working order and still lose the knowledge that keeps it standing.
Read the manifesto →
The argument
in six parts.
A warning about slow decline, and an invitation to test what might prevent it.
Where to begin.
Four small trials for people who share a workplace, a service or a town. Each leaves evidence the next person can use.
Run a handover drill
A crew lead and a paid apprentice
Choose one recurring fault and a safe practice environment. Let a second operator use the existing notes while the expert observes. Record each point where the learner needs help. Revise the notes and repeat with a fresh operator in 30 days.
Check the result. Count the interventions and time to safe recovery on both attempts.
Put one rule on the record
A civic clerk and the people affected
Choose a disputed local rule. Publish the event that prompted it, who bears its costs, the best objection and a review date. Invite a resident and a practitioner to offer a less burdensome way of addressing the same hazard.
Check the result. At the review, publish a reasoned decision to retain, revise or retire the rule.
Rehearse a safe handover from AI
An operator and an independent reviewer
Run a simulated fault on an isolated test system. Give the reviewer a separate stop path. Have the crew take over, maintain the essential service and document who can authorize a restart.
Check the result. Record missed faults, time to handover and whether intervention worked with the primary system offline.
Return time to the people who saved it
A team introducing automation
Before a trial, record who performs and checks the task. Agree how to share any time saved. After four weeks ask workers, including those on the least visible shift, where the work actually went.
Check the result. Compare hours saved with hours returned. Publish the discrepancy and the next adjustment.